BioMed 2.0

Technology, communications, and biomedical research from CTSI at UCSF

Skip to content
  • Communications
  • Collaboration Tools
  • Social Networking
  • Research Networking
  • Visualizations
Search

Virtual Sharing Environment

Database Helps Researchers Share and Find Those Data that Don’t Make it Into Peer-Reviewed Publications – A New Data Source for UCSF Profiles?

October 23, 2011February 20, 2012 / Katja Reuter / 2 Comments

Unpublished or negative data rarely leave the lab books, even though they may help the scientific community at large avoid the repetition of unnecessary experiments. I recently came across the Academic Productivity blog and Mark Hahnel’s post about FigShare, an interesting initiative, released in March 2011, that tries to make it easy for researchers to share those types of research results. Since the data are categorized and tagged, I’m wondering whether – at some point – the database could turn into a data source for Profiles.

Mark Hahnel explains FigShare:

This is a new way of bringing scientific research online and to a new audience. By categorising and tagging the research, it becomes very searchable …there is also the ability to easily share figures, datasets and videos via a host of social media platforms through ‘share buttons’ on every page.

Read the original post

Also noteworthy, FigShare is collaborating with Digital Science which provides a suite of tools to make science more productive.

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

Social Media and Science? Let’s Hear What Scientists Tell Us

June 6, 2011June 6, 2011 / Katja Reuter

I’m not surprised about the “slowness” that we see with respect to lab managers and scientists engaging in social media, as discussed in our earlier post. Many of us, scientists included, are still learning the ropes of productive online communication.

However in this video from Imperial College London scientists share some great insights how and why they actually use social media tools and how these tools help them with their research, their networking and managing their work.

Here are a couple of things I found interesting: 

  • They use those social media tools that they know others (colleagues etc.) use.
  • Twitter seems the exception:  Scientist may use Twitter (whether their colleagues use it or not) to follow science news feeds and people with interest in science. They appreciate that the breaking news coming out of  Twitter are sometimes faster than the BBC. They tweet  about their research and the research done by others.
  • Some use social media tools to increase their chances of being identified as an expert in a certain field.
  • Blogging and peer-reviewed publications don’t exclude each other: One researcher shares his experience how some of his blog posts have sparked follow-up discussions, have matured into scholarly articles and “accelerated the progress of science”. He also mentions that in some cases he gets more feedback (comments) on a blog post than giving a talk at a conference.
  • Preserving precious work: Some write blog posts based on tutorials, seminars which they developed for their students, designed to explain things in the best way.
  • Libel actions can become an issue, but it seems users of social media tools learn to deal with those as they go along.
  • Mendeley seems popular: Scientists use it to find papers that are relevant to their research concept and what others have published in a certain area – 2 things that our research networking tool, UCSF Profiles, seems to do pretty well.
  • Other tools they mention include Slideshare, Papers (a social paper management tool), Google docs, Google calendar, Wikipedia, Astrophysics Data System (a digital library portal for researchers in Astronomy and Physics) and arxiv.

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

Diigo – Snagit on steroids?

March 25, 2010 / Cynthia Piontkowski / 1 Comment

Diigo is an online collaboration tool that has some of the web capture & edit tools of Snagit, with groupware thrown in. It claims to provide “a ground-breaking collaborative research and learning tool that allows any group of people to pool their findings through group bookmarks, highlights, sticky notes, and forum.”

Seems like a great tool to use for sharing ideas about improving Virtual Home – not only could we archive screen captures of websites with features we admire, but we could post proposed changes to VH for the group to discuss.

Their tagline is “Research, Share, Collaborate” – sounds familiar.

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

The Unthinkable: Sharing Preliminary Results to Get Community Feedback

July 16, 2009February 7, 2011 / Katja Reuter

Usually scientists don’t speak about pre-publication research and preliminary findings in public. It’s the risk of being scooped. Yet there is an online platform ”Nature Precedings” that offers to do just that. It’s a free service offered by the Nature Publishing Group where scientists can share preliminary data posting pre-print manuscripts, posters, reports etc. It seems there are researchers out there who are open to trying such new approach. And, there is one incentive that may persuade even more researchers to throw the doors open: they can more easily claim earliest ownership for new ideas.

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

A Virtual Sharing Environment

June 10, 2009September 14, 2009 / Katja Reuter

Bioinformation scientists usually have large data to share. Myexperiment is an interesting example for a virtual research environment that allows sharing large data, workflows and methods. It is an initiative by a joint team from the universities of Southhampton and Manchester in the UK. Before “myexperiment” was available,  bioinformation scientists would email workflows or put photographs of notebooks on Flickr or the WIKI.

Using “myexperiment” they can add workflows to their profile, share it with other users, and create groups. Others can rate or tag the workflows and include them in their workflows. Here is a video that shows how this can work: A team scattered across continents shares large amounts of data. They were able to look more widely and find what others have missed.

“myexperiment” publications are available here.

Rate this:

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

About BioMed 2.0

We are a technology, communications and research facilitation group, writing about how web and other emerging technologies can foster collaboration and communication to accelerate biomedical research. Learn more...

Powered by CTSI at UCSF

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts and comments.

Join 85 other subscribers

Topic Cloud

Collaboration Tools Communications Crowdsourcing CTSI at UCSF Friday Fun Online Learning Open Science OpenSocial Participant Recruitment Print Media Profiles Research Networking Software Public Outreach Research Researcher Profiles Research for Better Health Research Networking Research Tools Search Social Media Social Networking Team Science Translational Research Twitter UCSF Profiles Upcoming Conference Video on the Web Virtual Sharing Environment Visualizations Web Analytics Web Design

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Photos on Flickr

Leslie Yuan, MPH, center, at the Women in Tech panel at 2017 UCSF Sharecase IT eventMolly Belinki & Brian Turner at the CTSI table, 2017 UCSF Sharecase IT eventCatalyst Team
More Photos

Archives

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • BioMed 2.0
    • Join 85 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • BioMed 2.0
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...